you are here: > Oceanic Union Judicial Code > Article 68 
 
11. General principles of criminal defense
 
  Article 68-Suspension of representation  
68.1 Suspension of representation  
  A defendant has the right to suspend their representation on the basis of legal competence if upon appeal to the judge/magistrate such argument and example is used (with the jury excused) showing specific example of such incompetence.  
  Upon being gven one specific example by the defendant, including the application to suspend representation, the judge/magistrate must then suspend and release the attorney at the wishes of the defendant.  
  However, if no reasonable example is provided and in the mind of the judge, such action by the defendant is shown to be a maneuvre to delay and/or disrupt court proceedings, then the judge may deny the application.  
68.2 No ground for an appeal  
  If in the deliberation of the judge/magistrate the application for suspension of representation by a defendant was seen to be based on insufficient/deficient evidence or on the basis of a disruptive obstruction then such a deliberation is no grounds for an appeal by the defendant.  
  However, if evidence is presented on the question of legal competence and denied by the judge/magistrate then such action may be grounds for an appeal.  
68.3 Replacement of representation  
  Upon suspension of representation, the defendant must make immediate action to have their representation secured by a new attorney within four (4) days so the suspension being approved, or face the court appointing legal representation.  
68.4 May not suspend representation more than twice  
  A defendant may not successfully suspend their representation more than twice during a case.  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
 

Copyright © 1999-2007 Oceanic-Union.Org. All rights reserved.